• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
BRIAN J GRABER LLC, Attorney at Law

BRIAN J GRABER LLC, Attorney at Law

Employment Lawyer

  • Home
  • PRACTICE AREAS
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact

Maximize Age Discrimination Damages

You are here: Home / Employment Discrimination / Maximize Age Discrimination Damages
May 3, 2020 by graberlaw
Judge's gavel laying on top of a law book opened to the chapter on age discrimination.
The IHRA provides broader remedies for age discrimination then ADEA.

Brian J Graber LLC, can maximize damages in age discrimination and retaliation cases by filing claims under the ADEA and the IHRA. The Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA) provides broader damages then the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Maximize damages for age discrimination by filing your claim under both the IHRA and the ADEA.

IHRA Allows Broader Damages for Age Discrimination Claims.

employee fired in violation of the age discrimination law.
Maximize your damages for age discrimination and retaliation claims.

The ADEA and IHRA prohibit discrimination against employees and applicants aged 40 and older. However, a plaintiff with a successful age discrimination claim under the ADEA can only seek monetary damages for backpay  (lost wages and benefits) and liquidated damages if there is proof of willful conduct. A successful plaintiff with an ADEA claim can be awarded equitable relief such as reinstatement or front pay. A successful plaintiff cannot recover money damages for compensatory damages and punitive damages under the ADEA. See Franzoni v. Hartmarx Corp., 300 F.3d 767, 773 (7th Cir. 2002). Compensatory damages are a form of monetary compensation for the mental and emotional suffering caused by an employer’s discriminatory employment action. Punitive damages is a form of monetary compensation awarded to a plaintiff to punish the employer for its conduct and to deter similar conduct in the future.

The IHRA allows a successful plaintiff to seek compensatory damages. 775 ILCS 5/8A-104(B) allows a successful plaintiff in an age discrimination claim to seek actual damages. “Actual damages” include monetary compensation for emotional harm and mental suffering. See ISS Int’l Serv. Sys. v. Human Rights Comm’n, 272 Ill.App.3d 969, 979 (1st Dist. 1995). As a result, a successful plaintiff can also seek monetary compensation for lost wages and benefits from the date of the civil rights violation. So for example, the IHRA allows a successful plaintiff to seek monetary damages for emotional and mental suffering caused by a wrongful termination.

The ADEA allows a plaintiff on a successful age discrimination claim to seek liquidated damages. Liquidated damages are statutory damages in an amount equal to the amount of backpay damages awarded. Liquidated damages require evidence that the employer committed a willful violation of the ADEA. The IHRA does not contain any provision for liquidated damages.

The ADEA Provides Broader Remedies for Retaliation.

The IHRA and the ADEA prohibit employers from retaliating against an employee for opposing age discrimination. However, the ADEA allows a successful plaintiff on a retaliation claim to recover compensatory and punitive damages. See Tomao v. Abbott Labs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55820 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 31, 2007) (allowing successful plaintiff with ADEA retaliation claim to recover compensatory and punitive damages). IHRA only allows a successful plaintiff with a retaliation claim to recover only compensatory damages.

Maximize the Available Remedies.

The best way to maximize damages for age discrimination and/or retaliation is to file claims under both the ADEA and the IHRA. An age discrimination claim under the IHRA allows recovery for the mental and emotional distress flowing from the adverse employment action. An ADEA may allows recovery of liquidated damages for a willful violation. Filing a retaliation claim under both the ADEA and the IHRA for opposing age discrimination maximizes the available damages for a successful plaintiff.

Maximization of damages for age discrimination requires the employer employ the statutorily required number of employees. A private employer is covered by the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. §630(b) if it employs at least 20 or more employees. A private employer is covered by the IHRA if it employs at least 15 more more employees. Effective July 1, 2020, the IHRA applies to an employer in the State of Illinois with at least one employee.

Contact Brian J Graber LLC, at (312) 291-4648 for a free consultation on age discrimination and retaliation claims.

Category: Employment Discrimination

About graberlaw

Previous Post:Pregnancy Discrimination laws laying on a desk.Pregnancy Accommodations
Next Post:MAXIMIZE DAMAGES ON DISABILITY RETALIATION CLAIMSDisability discrimination law book on a desk.

Sidebar

[callout bg="323232" class="text-xs-center"]

Free Consultation!

Call Brian J. Graber, Ltd., at (312) 291-4648 for your free consultation today. No Fields Found.
[/callout]

RECENT POSTS

Protected Activity Under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act Encompasses Reporting Violations of Common Law.

BRIAN J GRABER LLC is a Whistleblowers' Protection Act lawyer …

2025 Amendments to USERRA – Protecting Those Who Serve in the Armed Forces.

BRIAN J GRABER LLC is a USERRA attorney representing employees …

The ELCRA provides a cause of action for third-party retaliation claims.

BRIAN J GRABER PLLC represents Michigan employees who are …

U.S. Supreme Court Decides To Protect Whistleblowers

BRIAN J GRABER LLC represents employees in Illinois, Indiana, …

Federal bans mandatory arbitration of sexual harassment claims.

Federal Law Bans Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims

BRIAN J GRABER LLC is a sexual harassment lawyer representing …

BRIAN J GRABER LLC

  • Home
  • Practice Areas – Employment Law
    • Federal Sexual Harassment Law
    • Federal Employment Discrimination
    • Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Law
    • Federal Whistleblower Laws
    • Truck Driver Whistleblower Law
    • Railroad Whistleblower Law
    • Aviation Whistleblower Law AIR21
    • Food Safety Whistleblower Protections
    • Seaman’s Protection Act
    • Rapid Transit Whistleblower Law
    • Pipeline Whistleblower Law
    • Environmental Whistleblower
    • Nuclear Whistleblower
    • Federal Wage & Hour Law
    • Federal Wage & Hour Retaliation
    • Public Employee Civil Rights
    • FMLA Interference and Retaliation
    • False Claims Act-Whistleblower
    • Illinois Whistleblower Act
    • Illinois Wrongful Termination
    • Nursing Home Whistleblower Law
    • Illinois Sexual Harassment Law
    • Illinois Employment Discrimination Law
    • Illinois Pregnancy Discrimination Law
    • Illinois Wage & Hour Laws
    • Illinois Wage & Hour Retaliation
    • Retaliatory Discharge – Work Injury
    • Hospital Whistleblower Law
    • Ethics Act – Whistleblower Protections
    • Employee Classification Act Claims
    • Military Discrimination and Retaliation
    • Freelance Worker Protection Act
    • Personal Injury Litigation
    • Indiana Retaliatory Discharge – Work Injury
    • Indiana Retaliatory Discharge – Refusal to Engage In Illegal Activity
    • Indiana Employment Discrimination
    • Indiana Sexual Harassment
    • Indiana Pregnancy Discrimination Law
    • Indiana Wage & Hour Laws
    • Indiana Wage & Hour Retaliation
    • Indiana Employment Discrimination: Requiring Implantation of Devices
    • Indiana Personal Injury Litigation
    • Michigan Wrongful Termination
    • Michigan Employment Discrimination
    • Michigan Sexual Harassment Law
    • Michigan Retaliatory Discharge for Exercising Rights Under the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act
    • Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act
  • Blog
    • U.S. Supreme Court Decides To Protect Whistleblowers
    • 2025 Amendments to USERRA – Protecting Those Who Serve in the Armed Forces.
    • Protected Activity Under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act Encompasses Reporting Violations of Common Law.
    • The ELCRA provides a cause of action for third-party retaliation claims.
    • Pregnancy Accommodations
    • Federal Law Bans Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims
    • Coronavirus Anti-Retaliation Protections For Illinois Employees
    • Illinois Human Rights Act Protects All Employees.
    • MAXIMIZE DAMAGES ON DISABILITY RETALIATION CLAIMS
    • Maximize Age Discrimination Damages
    • Wrongful Discharge Workplace Violence
    • Forced to Drive an Unsafe Truck?
    • STAA Refusal to Drive Unsafe Trucks
  • About Us
  • Contact

Illinois Office Contact

200 E. Randolph Street

Suite 5100

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 291-4648

Indiana Office Contact

1251 N. Eddy Street

Suite 200

South Bend, IN 46617

(574) 395-5189

Michigan Contact

BRIAN J GRABER PLLC

325 W. Buffalo Street

Box 941

New Buffalo, MI 94117

(269) 230-6064

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Practice Areas

Employment Law

Personal Injury

Privacy/Disclaimer Policy

Copyright © 2025 · BRIAN J GRABER LLC, Attorney at Law · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme