• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
BRIAN J GRABER LLC, Attorney at Law

BRIAN J GRABER LLC, Attorney at Law

Employment Lawyer

  • Home
  • PRACTICE AREAS
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact

Indiana Retaliatory Discharge

You are here: Home / Indiana Retaliatory Discharge
Indiana Retaliatory Discharge - Work Injury
Brian J Graber LLC, represents Indiana employees fired in retaliation for seeking worker's compensation benefits.

Brian J Graber LLC is an Indiana retaliatory discharge lawyer representing employees fired in retaliation for exercising their rights to worker’s compensation benefits. Indiana employees have other protections from wrongful termination. Click here to learn about other protections Indiana employees have from wrongful terminations. Generally, in Indiana, an employer can terminate an at-will employee for any cause or no cause without incurring liability. See Walt’s Drive-A-Way Service v. Powell, 638 N.E.2d 857, 858 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994). However, in Indiana, an employer’s right to terminate an at-will employee is not absolute.

Since 1973, the Indiana Supreme Court has held that Indiana at-will employees fired in retaliation for filing a worker’s compensation claim for work-related injury have a common law tort claim of retaliatory discharge stating as follows:

. . . we hold that an employee who alleges he or she was retaliatorily discharged for filing a claim pursuant to the Indiana Workmen’s Compensation Act . . . or the Indiana Workmen’s Occupational Diseases Act . . . has stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. We further hold that such discharge would constitute an intentional, wrongful act on the part of the employer for which the injured employee is entitled to be fully compensated in damages.

Frampton v. Central Ind. Gas Co., 260 Ind. 249, 253 (Ind. 1973).

It is now well settled in Indiana that a cause of action for retaliatory discharge exists when an employee is discharged for exercising a statutorily conferred right, such as filing a worker’s compensation claim. Best Formed Plastics v. Shoun, 51 N.E. 3d 345,351 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). Therefore, filing a claim for worker’s compensation benefits is clearly protected activity in Indiana that will support a claim for retaliatory discharge.

In Stivers v. Stevens, 581 N.E. 2d 1254, 1254 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991) an employee was terminated immediately after she told her employer that she intended to file a worker’s compensation claim. The court in Stivers, 581 N.E. 2d at 1254, found that discharging an employee merely for suggesting she might file a claim has a stronger deleterious effect on an important statutory right. Therefore, an employee engages in protected activity in Indiana by informing his or her employer of their intent to file a worker’s compensation claim for a work-related injury.

Indiana Retaliatory Discharge protected activity
Employers who terminate an employee for filing a worker’s compensation claim or for declaring their intent to file a worker’s compensation claim may have liability under an Indiana common law tort of retaliatory discharge.

Retaliatory Discharge Burden of Proof

In Best Formed Plastics, LLC v. Shoun, 51 N.E. 3d 345, 351 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) the court held that Indiana follows a three-step approach to a retaliatory discharge claim as follows:

  1. The employee must prove, by a preponderance of of the evidence, a prima facie case, specifically, the employee must present evidence that directly or indirectly implies the necessary inference of causation between filing a worker’s compensation claim and the termination.
  2. Next the burden shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate non-retaliatory reason for the discharge.
  3. If the employer carries its burden, the employee then has the opportunity to prove that the reason cited by the employer is a pretext.

In Powdertech v. Joganic, 776 N.E. 2d 1251, 1262 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002) the court held an employee may establish pretext by showing that the employer’s reasons for the discharge are:

  • factually baseless;
  • not the actual motivation for the discharge; or
  • insufficient to motivate the discharge.

Damages

Damages for retaliatory discharge may include compensatory and punitive damages, including back pay and future pay. See Best Formed Plastics, LLC v. Shoun, 51 N.E. 3d at 353.

If you believe you may have an Indiana retaliatory discharge – work injury claim for filing a worker’s compensation claim, contact Brian J Graber LLC, an Indiana retaliatory discharge lawyer for a free confidential consultation at (574) 366-3069 or by email. Click here to learn more about your rights as an Indiana employee to be free from wrongful terminations in violation of Indiana or federal law.

Illinois Office Contact

77 W. Wacker Drive

Suite 4500

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 291-4648

Indiana Office Contact

1251 N. Eddy Street

Suite 200

South Bend, IN 46617

(574) 366-3069

Michigan Office Contact

5955 W. Main Street

Kalamazoo, MI 49009

(269) 216-4014

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Practice Areas

Employment Law

Personal Injury

Privacy/Disclaimer Policy

Copyright © 2023 · BRIAN J GRABER LLC, Attorney at Law · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme